Conservus network blogger David Shiffman esse in ultima gremiis of a * $10,000 doctrina provocatione. Pecunia non solum in blogging auxilium David in Scientia Australi Fried!, sed turpis investigationis conservationem (in certamine nominare turpis ipse mos tag cum pecunia). Accipies momentum et suffragium pro eo, cum omnibus 24 horae! Plumbum cum honesto sit amet %3 margin, illud ita teneamus.
chomp
Aliquam!
I am sure David’s efforts are a worthy and I am not necessarily speaking out against a vote for Dave. Autem, there are twenty candidates and each one deserves fair consideration. Wouldn’t you agree?
Of course I agree they are worthy of consideration, however I’ve been voting for David and encourage you to do the same. I’m not exactly an unbiased observer in this game, and never suggested the other blogs were not worth your time. You are free to make up your own mind!
Another finalist, Heather Cohen, is a grad student who’s research has direct benefits on human health and will help people suffering from autoimmune diseases such as diabetes, lupus, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.. A vote for Heather Cohen is a vote for human health!
While I certainly support Heather and her research, I don’t particularly think a it’s fair to play the human health card. Conserving our oceans might not help a dying person today, but perhaps instead help feed a starving world tomorrow (no spin there haha!). But in my opinion, medical research is vastly better funded than conservation work, the money David might get would have a much larger impact.
[…] breasts leads to impotence: the population genetics of captive-reared turkeys November 23, 2011Votum pro Conservationem PISTRIS! November 22, 2011A Copper Butterfly in Disguise November 20, 2011Bugs in Reno: HOC 2011 November […]