Sed leo est, aes Amphitruo

Caeruleum enim quod videtur omnibus et intentionum papilio (ut in subfamily Polyommatinae)… suus ', et nimis omnibus. Sed ex colore, ut adducerem te sumpserit, non recta via,; quasi species electri, fit quidem hoc papilio. Sunt subtilis differentia in cornu speciem et probabiliter venationem, but when I first saw these butterflies I assumed they were a sub-species of Plebejus icarioides (quod were quoque flying at this location on the Kaibab Plateau). But then I began seeing female butterflies (infra) interacting with these blues and then it dawned on meblue copperLycaena heteronea austin (Lycaenidae: Lycaeninae)!

This subspecies was originally described in 1998 by the late, great George T. Austin as In. heteronea rutila. Given however that rutila more or less = rutilus, it was later determined rutila was actually unavailable and the subspecies name was changed to austin in honor of George.

Grinter Lycaena heteroena austin

male Lycaena heteroena austin (Lycaenidae)

% title

female Lycaena heteroena austin

 

2 comments to A Copper Butterfly in Disguise