આ પ્રેસ જીનિયસ અન્ય એક હપતો, એક સોફ્ટબોલ ની અને કદાચ થોડી. (અરેરે આ શોધી સરળ હોય) મને કોણ કહી શકે કે શું ખોટું છે આ લેખ?
આ પ્રેસ જીનિયસ, માં. ચોથોઆ પ્રેસ જીનિયસ અન્ય એક હપતો, એક સોફ્ટબોલ ની અને કદાચ થોડી. (અરેરે આ શોધી સરળ હોય) મને કોણ કહી શકે કે શું ખોટું છે આ લેખ?
આ શેર કરો!4 comments to Genius of the Press, માં. ચોથો |
નાસ્તિકતા |
કૂવો, I’m no moth expert, but that picture is not Copitarsia or any other noctuid.
વધુમાં, “the Noctuid Moth”? As if Copitarsia is the only representative of this humongous family – what are there, several tens of thousands of species?
The picture figures a Brahmaeidae!!!!
Exactly! Maurizio hit the nail on the head with the correct family ID for the moth, it is most likely Brahmaea hearseyi (Brahmaeidae), which is closely related to a silk moth. Not only is the family way off, but these moths are from Malaysia.
Ted pointed out another important fact. એક “Noctuid” moth is a type of moth, not one species (one of tens of thousands). The way they worded the article was painful… “the Noctuid moth”!
Another example of ridiculously bad science journalism.
Australia’s population of fire ants are always appearing in the press, and I’ve lost count of the number of times I have seen other families of ant depicted. Can’t be that hard to find a genuine Solenopsis pic…
તે સિવાય…I just wanted to say what a stunning moth that is. Not seen one before.
(ઓહ… and nice blog!)